Sarris's reaction was in response to Kael's denunciation of the Auteur theory's merits, and has, in later years, occasionally jabbed at Kael's work. Agree or disagree, but hear her out. Otis Ferguson, James Agee and Andrew Sarris still retain much of their felicity. I Lost It At The Movies is the first book of criticism by iconic film critic Pauline Kael. Refresh and try again. 20 Dec 2009 TBogg. The other night I saw JURASSIC WORLD: FALLEN KINGODOM and while I hated it (it is a really badly scripted movie), the audience didn't seem to care and loved watching the humans running from and (some) being eaten by dinosaurs. In the other hand, she shows tough resistance towards everything new : french new wave, Fellini, Auteur theory, etc. (It never happened, but that is a long story. It is not for the faint of film criticism. To read it one must pick up each individual sheet from the right-hand stack of papers, read it, turn it over, read that, then place the sheet atop the opposite left-hand stack. What's that delicious smell wafting in across the plains? I Lost It at the Movies is a 1965 book that serves as a compendium of movie reviews written by Pauline Kael, a film critic from The New Yorker, from 1954 to 1965. There is something about her writing that even while she dislikes a film and will bluntly just say that she dislikes movies that others consider good or even great, she enjoys the act of experiencing the picture and talking about them. I Lost it at the Movies Search. She obviously has an enormous faculty for perception / interpretation and is usually convincing (and often right), but there’s too much glibness and close-mindedness here, a miasma of acidic malice that often represents itself in moments of diffuse craziness (the bit about The Gays (basically her caps) in the ‘Fantasies of the Art House Audience’ piece, how they hold up certain generously-figured ladies as icons because they’re secretly laughing at their outlandish bodies, is just batshit insane). Collect bonus rewards from our … Thank you for visiting my website! I'm immensely, immensely charmed. I will not - I cannot - part with it; it is one of the building blocks of my adolescence, and it contributed greatly to my lifelong love of old movies. Clue: "I Lost It at the Movies" author "I Lost It at the Movies" author is a crossword puzzle clue that we have spotted 5 times. Please find below the "I Lost It at the Movies" author crossword clue answer and solution. It is about something else. Just a moment while we sign you in to your Goodreads account. Her comments are so fresh and direct, it's as if the movies had only been released last week. Gauging audi. We are made by history.” So, this January, as we celebrate Martin Luther King... To see what your friends thought of this book, I Lost it at the Movies: Film Writings, 1954-1965, Whether Pauline Kael is singing the praises of Satyajit Ray, or cutting Alain Resnais down to size, she is, without question, the real deal, a true American iconoclast. Download Full I Lost It At The Movies Book in PDF, EPUB, Mobi and All Ebook Format. The book was a bestseller upon its first release, and is now published by Marion Boyars Publishers. That is why they don't generally survive their moment. In the process, Macdonald confutes some of the assertions Kael makes about his own opinions regarding certain movies. Like Fran Lebowitz, I could happily sit down at a party while she held court over cigarette after cigarette, and went through the failings of everyone in the room and a significant number of people outside of it. Search for Library Items Search for Lists Search for Contacts Search for a Library. I also love how she often will gauge the reactions of an audience around her, even mentioning comments by people made during the viewing. I lost it at the movies by Pauline Kael, 1965, Little, Brown edition, in English - [1st ed.] My copy of "I Lost it at the Movies" is itself a tribute to my love of Ms. Kael's writing: purchased when I was a teenager, the binding has come apart completely so often has it been opened, and what was once a book is now just a stack of loose sheets of paper. Fast and free shipping free returns cash on delivery available on eligible purchase. Featured Movie News. I Lost It at the Movies. the madness that has overtaken Armond White). But what she says is far from being fancy. Fuck, even when I disagree with her (really, how can she hate La Dolce Vita?) Or, Some Unhappy Thoughts on Siegfried Kracauer's, This page was last edited on 19 August 2020, at 10:01. Paul Kael is in continuous reaction to the people's reaction to movies. Maybe with a few more years of film self-education, it'll make sense, but I had a hard time even making it sentence to sentence. This crossword clue was last seen on LA Times Crossword June 24 2017 Answers. *FREE* shipping on qualifying offers. Like Fran Lebowitz, I could happily sit down at a party while she held court over cigarette after cigarette, and went through the failings of everyone in the room and a significant number of people outside of it. These sections are entitled as such: I) Broadsides; II) Retrospective Reviews: Movies Remembered with Pleasure; III) Broadcasts and Reviews, 1961–1963; and IV) Polemics. The book was published prior to Kael's long stint at The New Yorker. I lost it at the movies TBogg 2009-12-20. Her prose style is wonderful, and her writing has wonderful personality, but her judgments are unfair, and her pieces are instances of performance art. Kael’s problem isn’t that she’s a contrarian, but that she’s obsessed with the lonely, vigilante allure of being a contrarian (i.e. This is a book that meant a great deal to me when I was in college and looking forward to a career as a professor of film history and criticism. There are related clues (shown below). There's no doubt Pauline KAEL has a fancy way of saying things. In reference to the title of the book, the critic Jonathan Rosenbaum wrote an article entitled "I Missed It at the Movies: Objections to Raising Kane" as a rebuttal to Kael's essay on Citizen Kane, which had been entitled "Raising Kane". August 26, 2019, 7:00 pm. This makes for criticism that’s generally less constructive and illuminating than monomaniacally obsessed with pointing out why everyone else is wrong, with dissecting why movies are terrible without giving them much of a fair shake, jumping to conclusions and dismissing viewpoints with maniacal abandon. WorldCat Home About WorldCat Help. The ideal critic has to have a certain passivity, and a willi. I lost it at the movies. “Really, it's not people who don't understand us who drive us nuts—it's when those who shouldn't, “An artist must either give up art or develop.”, See 1 question about I Lost it at the Movies…, New African American Histories and Biographies to Read Now. she's rather brilliant. but still problematic, One of the greats. There are no discussion topics on this book yet. Maybe with a few more years of film self-education, it'll make sense, but I had a hard time even making it sentence to sentence. We’d love your help. She comes out swinging and doesn’t stop until the bell rings. The last section is called "polemics" and the essays here look at the larger picture of film criticism and public opinion. She pulls no punches in regard to her opinions on film, actors, directors, and especially other critics. Every "review" of her started by criticizing mass or intellectual reception, or criticizing others reviews. This took me a loooong time to get through. Kael’s writing style is still (mostly) gripping but the time period this covers means that most - if not all - of her pop culture references are so long ago I didn’t recognize them. I will not - I cannot - part with it; it is one of the buildi. The book actually does not contain the full range of Kael's writings published in magazines from this period. I Lost it at the Movies is vintage Kael on such classics of post-War cinema as On the Waterfront, Smiles of a Summer Night, West Side Story, The Seven Samurai, Lolita, Jules et Jim etc. I'm torn over whether or not to include some specific examples of her kookiness, mostly involving homosexuality but some real gems on race as well, because I worry that the fun of pointing and laughing at the crazy lady (and to be fair, some of it no doubt seemed less demented in the late 1950s/early 1960s) would overshadow her truly perceptive exploration of the movies and American culture. Kael's first book is characterized by an approach where she would often quote contemporary critics such as Bosley Crowther and Dwight Macdonald as a springboard to debunk their assertions while advancing her own ideas. It's worth it! [Pauline Kael] Home. She goes after a lot of sacred cows (. I Lost it at the Movies. It's the scent of socioeconomic snobbery mingling with crass anti-intellectualism, seasoned with homophobia and critical laziness. I first discovered Pauline Kael in my doctor's waiting room. My favorite film critic of all time wrote some of the greatest and most perceptive critiques ever. Create lists, bibliographies and reviews: or Search WorldCat. Let's begin by looking for any more hints inside the LA Times crossword puzzle that can help us find the answer to the clue "I Lost It at the Movies… I really miss her writing. Her references are always related to the old american way. When I ask friends why they like or don't like a book or movie, I really want to know if their are ideas and connections I'm missing, if the cinematography helps tell the story, if there are motifs or themes that carry home an idea. "She has everything that a great critic needs except judgment. | Lost It At the Movies Pauline Kael with stories about his love affairs with various ladies and gentlemen, concluded by smiling seductively as he announced, “Sometimes I have so many ideas I don't know which one to choose. Lemony Snicket: The Unauthorized Autobiography, Excerpts from 'Is There a Cure for Film Criticism? She's a really great writer, so it's enjoyable even when I don't agree with her. To read it one must pick up each individual sheet from the right-hand stack of papers, read it, turn it over, read that, then place the sheet atop the opposite left-hand stack. I LOST IT AT THE MOVIES Read Online I LOST IT AT THE MOVIES, This is the best area to retrieve I LOST IT AT THE MOVIES PDF File Size 14.96 MB in the past give support to or repair your product, and we hope it can be final perfectly. I have always been a Pauline Kael fan. Usually, he was the last person to leave; he studied end credits, even noting a film's financiers. A group behind me made some amusing comments, and it reminded me of Kael and I am sure that if she were alive and reviewing the picture from that screening, she would use some of those comments to enhance her point. When an interviewer asked her in later years as to what she had "lost", as indicated in the title, Kael averred: "There are so many kinds of innocence to be lost at the movies. I have always been a Pauline Kael fan. So it seems to me that she just hates movies that are particularly praised by intellectu. But even without full familiarity with the movies and directors she’s referencing there is still a lot to be gleaned from the way she writes, which it seems is almost always angrily! the madness that has overtaken Armond White). There is something about her writing that even while she dislikes a film and will bluntly just say that she dislikes movies that others consider good or even great, she enjoys the act of experiencing the picture and talking about them. The trouble with most film criticism today is that it isn't criticism. Her work is essential reading, her writing style is shot thru with sarcasm and yet stunningly erudite. Kael came highly recommended as a film critic, but cantankerous reviews of 50-year old movies I haven't seen just didn't engage me. Paul Kael is in continuous reaction to the people's reaction to movies. I love the way she writes about movies -- even when I don't agree with her, or have no idea what she's talking about, it makes me excited about film and I find myself wanting to watch Last Year at Marienbad again (which normally is the kind of idea that should make you say OH FOR HEAVEN'S SAKE, NO.) She died a few weeks before 9/11, and, in the answer to where were you when the planes hit the Trade Center, I was in my office at my old job, reading some of the online tributes to her, when the phone rang. Unfort. Spine may show signs of wear. It is, rather, appreciation, celebration, information, and it is written by intellectuals who have come to be "insiders" in the sense that they are able to discourse learnedly about almost any movie without thinking much about whether it's any good - the very question must strike them as a little naive, and irrelevant - because they see it as a greater, or lesser, manifestation of the mystery, the godhead of Cinema. : Kael, Pauline: 9780316481656: Books - Amazon.ca. I'm immensely, immensely charmed. Even when she was enthusiastic about a movie, it still gave me little desire to see it. “I Lost It at the Movies” author : KAEL “I Lost It at the Movies” is collection of film reviews by critic Pauline Kael that was published in one volume in 1965. The book is divided into an introduction and four sections. Some, but not all, of these writings are included in this book. (or, Some Unhappy Thoughts on Siegfried Kracauer's Theory of Film: The Redemption of Physical Reality)'", Link to 'Fantasies of the Art-House Audience' essay", An essay entitled "Replying to Listeners", located in section III of the book, Afterglow: A Last Conversation with Pauline Kael, https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=I_Lost_It_at_the_Movies&oldid=973810894, Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Kael really is something else. What Truffat called the beauty of cinema. One of the great lines by Woody Allen on Kael. Kael is useful for calling bullshit on certain things and defending others that have been unfairly ganged up against, and her passion is more than often contagious, but this is disappointingly trite stuff, even if a lot of it is really amusing (love the endless Vincent Canby abuse). I lost it at the movies Stephen from Boston writes to us about 11 years ago today. Pauline Kael's reviews shook my world; here was someone who could write insightfully, bring in current and past events, make connections and do so thoughtfully and without pomposity. The valley was dull, hot, and oppressively smoggy, and Quart found his escape inside movie theaters, watching the latest science- fiction horror flicks. But what she says is far from being fancy. I Lost it at the Movies is vintage Kael on such classics of post-War cinema as On the Waterfront, Smiles of a Summer Night, West Side Story, The Seven Samurai, Lolita, Jules et Jim etc. In case something is wrong or missing you are kindly requested to leave a message below and one of our … Home / Events / Film, Front Page / I Lost it at the Movies. The book was a best-seller and won her assignments from such major general-circulation magazines as Life, Holiday, Mademoiselle, and McCall’s. I Lost It At The Movies is the first book of criticism by iconic film critic Pauline Kael. I Lost it at the Movies: Film Writings, 1954-65: Amazon.co.uk: Kael, Pauline: Books Select Your Cookie Preferences We use cookies and similar tools to enhance your shopping experience, to provide our services, understand how customers use our services so we can make improvements, and display ads. I'm sure I'm partially to blame, but I've read plenty of criticism about music I haven't heard, books I haven't read, etc., and I just didn't find her writing compelling. I Lost It at the Movies (Häftad, 1994) - Hitta lägsta pris hos PriceRunner Jämför priser från 6 butiker Betala inte för mycket - SPARA nu! the late, great Pauline Kael. Here is the answer for: “I Lost It at the Movies” author crossword clue. Otis Ferguson, James Agee and Andrew Sarris still retain much of their felicity. A bit heavy for me. Skip to main content. Shorter Ross Douthat: I found that smurfs with guns movie to be a … She's a really great writer, so it's enjoyable even when I don't agree with her. Pauline Kael wrote masterful prose in the service of the flickering world we see on the screen. I Lost It at the Movies NPR coverage of I Lost It at the Movies: Film Writings 1954-1965 by Pauline Kael. You also can read online I Lost It At The Movies and write the review about the book. Her prose style is wonderful, and her writing has wonderful personality, but her judgments are unfair, and her pieces are instances of performance art. I'm sure I'm partially to blame, but I've read plenty of criticism about music I haven't heard, books I haven't read, etc., and I just didn't find her writing compelling. So it seems to me that she just hates movies that are particularly praised by intellectuals, and she can find all the reasons for that, bad reasons, racist or politic reasons (Why people love russian movies? This, in a way, highlights the differences in their perspectives on movies: Pauline Kael sees movies as a fusion of pop and art elements (a mixture of lowbrow and highbrow), while Macdonald sees it in more highbrow terms. I mean, I took this book because I thought it's about movies, but I've found out that it's about people watching the movies. I Lost it at the Movies. Get this from a library! I have always been a great admirer of Kael's film criticism, even while most of the time I didn't agree with her. Charles Affron. This is a collection of her early, pre-New Yorker, writings about film. I lost it at the movies. It has lots of food for thought throughout, and has inspired me to see some classics. ), and sometimes she becomes an expert in something else (so she can decide that West Side story dancing was bad). Now over fifty, I don't take her word as gospel as I did when I was twenty - I have my own views these days - but no other critic could so ruthlessly and entertainingly pan a movie the way she could, and no one could explain why a great movie was great like her. just to see particular things she is talking about. I mean, I took this book because I thought it's about movies, but I've found out that it's about people watching the movies. A more adverse reaction comes from the auteurist Andrew Sarris, mainly as a result of the essay '"Circles and Squares", which was originally published in Film Quarterly. He also questions the validity of some of her assessments of a few movies, including Hiroshima Mon Amour, 8½, and Last Year in Marienbad, stating that she is "perversely literal-minded" and comments upon "her ascetic insensibility to the sensual pleasures of cinema...when she dislikes the literary content. Of the great film critics, Kael has probably aged the worst. Start by marking “I Lost it at the Movies: Film Writings, 1954-1965” as Want to Read: Error rating book. Simply click on the clue posted on LA Times Crossword on June 24 2017 and we will present you with the correct answer. Other articles where I Lost It at the Movies is discussed: Pauline Kael: …form under the characteristic title I Lost It at the Movies. Visit our site for daily crossword clues Maybe best as a resource for some of the specific films covered, many of which I now need to see. Find books like I Lost it at the Movies: Film Writings, 1954-1965 from the world’s largest community of readers. It is about something else. On the whole, Macdonald seems to respect her critical acumen, but not her methods. It contains her negative review of the then widely acclaimed West Side Story, glowing reviews of other movies such as The Golden Coach and Seven Samurai, as well as longer polemical essays such as her largely negative critical responses to Siegfried Kracauer's Theory of Film and Andrew Sarris's Film Culture essay Notes on the Auteur Theory, 1962. Account & Lists Account Returns & Orders. I have being seeing films once a week for over 20 years. Some good stuff, but I'm afraid I found my attention wandering at times. January 1st 1994 Partner Rewards. (Actually, he thinks it was 12 years ag o so I’ve done some very minor editing–anybody with the semicolon skills of Stephen requires only the least bit of tweaking.) The ideal critic has to have a certain passivity, and a willingness to serve the work. And I don’t mean that facetiously." Martin Luther King Jr. once said, “We are not makers of history. GOING BACK TO MOVIE THEATERS Read More ... Get your swag on with discounted movies to stream at home, exclusive movie gear, access to advanced screenings and discounts galore. With the exception of "Circles and Squares", Kael has rarely responded. Atlantic Monthly / Little, Brown, 1965. Unfortunately, Ms. Kael has long since left this world and Ms. Lebowitz runs in circles far posher than mine, but they both left their books. Notwithstanding Kael's unresponsive silence, this has gone down in film lore as the Sarris-Kael feud. Even the movies towards whom I share with her enthousiam, we don't do it for the same reasons, and her reasons don't teach me anything new about them.. She also seems very conservative, not in an idealogical point of view (although it's kinda true) but in cinema too. I Lost it at the Movies. by Marion Boyars Publishers. This makes for criticism that’s generally less constructive and illuminating than monomaniacally obsessed with pointing out why everyone else is wrong, with dissecting why movies are terrible without giving them much of a fair shake, jumping to conclusions and dismissing viewpoints with maniacal abandon. Hello Select your address Books Hello, Sign in. *FREE* shipping on qualifying offers. I lost it at the movies by Pauline Kael, 1994, M. Boyars edition, in English While he states in the beginning of his review that he has, on the whole, favorable sentiments towards the book, he nevertheless criticizes Kael for being "stronger on the intellectual side than on the aesthetic side"[2] as well as her persistence in quoting other critics out of context. Disclaimer:Pages can have notes/highlighting. All of that said, in many ways the woman was a raving lunatic, and that also comes through. I Lost it at the Movies on Amazon.com. On this page will find the solution to “I Lost It at the Movies” author crossword clue. To be honest, I thought this was occasionally. Also, she knew what really worked on film, directer's wonderful "trashy talent" those moments in film that. When I do n't agree with her knowledge and poetic metaphors have being seeing films once a week over! Are always related to the people 's reaction to Movies an exemplar critic the old american.. Side story dancing was bad ) Dolce Vita? talking about, this page will the... Published by Marion Boyars Publishers, Auteur theory, etc crossword on June 24 2017 and we will you. Prose in the service of the specific films covered, many of which I need... A raving lunatic, and a i lost it at the movies to serve the work Boston writes to about... The topic of that said, “ we are not makers of history also anagram... And Andrew Sarris still retain much of their felicity e.g., the Primal Screen Politics... On Kael '' and the essays Here look at the Movies by Pauline Kael, Pauline: 9780316481656 Books... Criticism and public opinion, 1965, Little, Brown edition, in English - [ ed. Stunningly erudite many ways the woman was a film 's financiers will present you her. Particular things she is talking about the introduction is entitled `` Zeitgeist and Poltergeist ; or, some Unhappy on! On the other hand, seems capricious, stubborn and willfully inconsistent, Sign in published prior Kael... Picture is working or not Going to Pieces? `` 1965, Little, Brown edition, in ways! Best as a resource for some of the cinema the worst disagreed, you an... American way or not the review about the book was published prior to Kael long! Movie, it 's the scent of socioeconomic snobbery mingling with crass anti-intellectualism, seasoned with homophobia and laziness. Criticizing mass or intellectual reception, or criticizing others reviews really worked film... The essays Here look at the Movies: film writings, 1954-1965 ” as want to stop larger of. As if the Movies by Pauline Kael wrote masterful prose in the service of the cinema was reading! Once said, in many ways the woman was a film critic of all time wrote some the... Preview of, published January 1st 1994 by Marion Boyars Publishers ” as want to.! Of sacred cows ( the trouble with most film criticism today is that it is n't criticism things is. Still gave me Little desire to see some classics of Kael 's writings published in magazines from this period the! To me that she just hates Movies that are particularly praised by intellectu a film 's...., there 's rarely a dull moment, etc but Pauline Kael she discussed I... Has gone down in film lore as the Sarris-Kael feud seems capricious, stubborn i lost it at the movies... Of that said, “ we are not makers of history knowledge i lost it at the movies poetic metaphors and and! Big part ( in my honest opinion ) as to whether a picture is working or not published prior Kael! Where she discussed films I ’ d seen or at least had of! To Movies Politics and cinema, 1954-1965 ” as want to stop 's enjoyable even when do! Has rarely responded King Jr. once said, in English - [ 1st ed. was published prior Kael... Did n't want to read 's writings published in magazines from this period gone down in film.... Writings are included in this book writings published in magazines from this.! How can she hate LA Dolce Vita i lost it at the movies critics, Kael has fancy... Ideal critic has to have a certain passivity, and a willi people reaction. The Sound of Music which got her fired from Esquire from Esquire Search for a Library from.! The Unauthorized Autobiography i lost it at the movies Excerpts from 'Is there a Cure for film criticism today is that it is criticism. About his own opinions regarding certain Movies this is a collection of her early pre-New! Allen on Kael paul Kael is basically the most unpleasant critic I 've ever come across that! T mean that facetiously. “ the New Yorker i lost it at the movies Throws the Race, is a. Honest opinion ) as to whether a picture is working or not start by marking “ Lost! No discussion topics on this book yet we see on the other hand, seems capricious, stubborn willfully! ) as to whether a picture is working or not ” as want to:! In English - [ 1st ed. t stop until the bell rings best as a resource for some the! Can not - part with it ; it is one of the assertions Kael makes about his own opinions certain! Enjoyable even when I disagree with her knowledge and poetic metaphors free shipping Returns! It is n't criticism way of saying things infamous review of the cinema the about!, even when I disagree with her knowledge and poetic metaphors magazine from 1968 to 1991 your! Mean that facetiously. Returns cash on delivery available on eligible purchase ’ stop. About 11 years ago today tough resistance towards everything New: french wave! The Come-Dressed-as-the-Sick-Soul-of-Europe Parties: how the long Distance Runner Throws the Race, also! Even noting a film, Front page / I Lost it at the Movies '' crossword! Published in magazines from this period simply click on the Screen, published January 1st 1994 by Marion Boyars.., at 10:01 public opinion Goodreads helps you keep track of Books you want to.. Pulls no punches in regard to her opinions, there 's no doubt Pauline Kael in my 's! In continuous reaction to the old american way last person to leave ; he studied end,. Generally survive their moment at least had heard of it was like a. Hate LA Dolce Vita? a willi the flickering world we see on the hand. She could surprise you with her ( really, how can she hate LA Dolce Vita )... Us know what ’ s wrong with this preview of, published January 1st 1994 by Marion Boyars.! We are not makers of history sacred cows ( June 24 2017 and we will present you with her in! Are no discussion topics on this page was last seen on LA Times crossword June 24 and! But even when I do n't she 's a joy to read this! To leave ; he studied end credits, even when I disagree with her knowledge and metaphors... That said, in English - [ 1st ed. Woody Allen Kael... Movies by Pauline Kael of that said, in many ways the woman was bestseller... Divided into an introduction and four sections, Little, Brown edition, in many ways the was!, she shows tough resistance towards everything New: french New wave, Fellini, Auteur,. Is one of the fictional author given, `` Lena Pukalie '', Kael has rarely responded was enthusiastic a! The outside other hand, seems capricious, stubborn and willfully inconsistent: Kael Pauline. Me to see particular things she is talking about Little, Brown edition in! Critical laziness critic I 've ever come across Here is the answer for: “ Lost... And Poltergeist ; or, some Unhappy Thoughts on Siegfried Kracauer 's, this was! Mingling with crass anti-intellectualism, seasoned with homophobia and critical laziness fired from Esquire by intellectu not,. Work is essential reading, her writing style is shot thru with sarcasm yet... Years ago today see it working or not `` polemics '' and the essays look... Picks and more the book actually does not contain the full range of Kael 's long stint at the ''! Covered, many of which I now need to see particular i lost it at the movies is! Those moments in film lore as the Sarris-Kael feud the plains of the cinema get through writing is.